NOW, comes the Accused, appearing specially and not generally or voluntarily, but under threat of arrest if he failed to do so, with this "BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE FOR DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION," stating as follows:
The forgotten legal maxim is that free people have a right to travel on the roads which are provided by their servants for that purpose, using ordinary transportation of the day. Licensing cannot be required of free people, because taking on the restrictions of a license requires the surrender of a right. The driver's license can be required of people who use the highways for trade, commerce, or hire; that is, if they earn their living on the road, and if they use extraordinary machines on the roads. If you are not using the highways for profit, you cannot be required to have a driver's license.
If ever a judge understood the public's right to use the public roads, it was Justice Tolman of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. Justice Tolman stated:
It was a frustrating process, but they just follow the rules. In the end, Leah was awesome. They were helpful, and efficient. They need more resources, and I needed to do my part. I will return to this office.
Called to schedule an appointment to take my road test without anyone telling me I didn't have to wait in line. Waited in line for an hour, they called my number, I told them I had a road test, they gave me a little attitude about how I didn't have to wait in line. Told them no one told me and they insisted that yes, someone told me. If someone told me, I WOULDNT HAVE WAITED IN LINE LIKE AN IDIOT FOR AN HOUR. SO NO, NO ONE TOLD ME. I should have spoken to someone in charge. Now I have to reschedule and drive 45 minutes to get there again. Thanks.
The following argument has been used in at least three states (Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia) as a legal brief to support a demand for dismissal of charges of "driving without a license." It is the argument that was the reason for the charges to be dropped, or for a "win" in court against the argument that free people can have their right to travel regulated by their servants.
The "most sacred of liberties" of which Justice Tolman spoke was personal liberty. The definition of personal liberty is:
RIGHTS
It's the DMV, so keep your expectations in check. Compared to others though, they're pretty damn good. I had my licence in 20 min
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE FOR DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
"Complete freedom of the highways is so old and well established a blessing that we have forgotten the days of the Robber Barons and toll roads, and yet, under an act like this, arbitrarily administered, the highways may be completely monopolized, if, through lack of interest, the people submit, then they may look to see the most sacred of their liberties taken from them one by one, by more or less rapid encroachment."
I been multiple times to this location, not only it moves fast the staff has been very cortious to me and helpful.
Robertson vs. Department of Public Works, 180 Wash 133, 147.
The words of Justice Tolman ring most prophetically in the ears of Citizens throughout the country today as the use of the public roads has been monopolized by the very entity which has been empowered to stand guard over our freedoms, i.e., that of state government.
ARGUMENT
Department Of Motor Vehicles Abbeville is a US Local Government Office based in Abbeville, Louisiana. Department Of Motor Vehicles Abbeville is located at 112 Rue Centre, Abbeville, LA 70510, USA.
Please contact with Department Of Motor Vehicles Abbeville using information above: Address, Phone number, Fax, Postal code, Website address, E-mail, Facebook. Find Department Of Motor Vehicles Abbeville opening hours and driving directions or map. Find real customer reviews and ratings or write your own review.
Find Local Government Office in Abbeville